|
Author
|
Topic: For god's sakes Jim. I'm a coder, not a flamer!
|
hussain S4d4m Hussain, 1st General, IRC & Script Kiddie Division
|
posted 03-21-2001 03:26
./me dons an abestos suitOkay, I have to air something. The flamewars have gotten childish. And I am probably going to get flamed too. I can feel it, but hey, what can I do. Since we all care about penIs I think that it's in our best interests to NOT flame Fenomas as he is our friend. He took the time to make a nice layout (IMHO KTHX.) and frankly, instead of whining, complaining, and griping about the quality of the layout, why not tell him in the form of *constructive* critique on what to do. I mean screenshots, sites which he should take elements from, and stuff like that. Instead of saying that the main logo is gay (I frankly think it's pretty damn cool) come up with a better one. If penIs has such a dedicated readership then we shouldn't have ANY problem coming up with an intelligent (correct me on this if i'm wrong) and eloquent way of improving the site. For the love of god people, we're *supposed* to be on the same side. It's not like we're meant to flame eachother until we're crispy. [This message has been edited by hussain (edited 03-21-2001).] IP: Logged |
Clme cake fiend
|
posted 03-21-2001 03:52
The problem with flamewars is that they can become addictive and contagious.Oh, shit. I need another flamewar hit. Where's mightymon when I need him? IP: Logged |
FaRaN Member with a member bigger than the member with a member
|
posted 03-21-2001 06:30
hussain, people often get in flamewars without wanting to flame or being flamed at all... I for one, HATE flame wars.I think letting random people help with the design of a page is not a good idea, especially a page visited by random people and flamed by random people. I think Eod should just point a friend out who he thinks is a great designer, and is willing to do it, and let him design the page. Or do it himself. Al this 'let people think along' will only result in a testosteron-fest like : "I am the best, let ME do it. Fuck you Faran! you suck at designing! LEt me do it! ME ME ME ME ME ME!" Redesign it, and all visitors will wait in anticipation (sp?) on what it will look like. Now thats fun!  My 2 cents... (This is NOT a flame, this is my oppinion/suggestion) IP: Logged |
MightyMon s0m30n3 s3t up us the m0n
|
posted 03-21-2001 11:01
FLAME ON!!!!Oh wait, wrong thread. ------------------ Dad, I'm sorry I shot you. IP: Logged |
eod TREAT MERIGHT!
|
posted 03-21-2001 11:49
Trust me guys.. I'm not going to let everyone design the site, this is how it became the state it is today.1) I coded the original 2) Jeer did some changes. 3) Fen knew flash and one day I woke up and there flash at the top. Seriously I didn't even know he was putting it in. Fen was working with the excisting layout. He has since built the back end of penIs today through his php programming. What I plan to do with this mailing list is get constructive feedback during the design phase. Depending how we decide to layout out the new site will determine if we need many code slaves (with one person over seeing) or just one person. I tried the find a designer and let that person redo the site. You know what? Every designer I have met is LAZY.. I mean extremely lazy.. Since I'm not some company with a lot of money and a deadline he can start work on the night before it is due. This seems like the best way. Unless you want me to whip out my design skills and do another site. It wouldn't be horrible but it'd look like every other damn e/n site out there. IP: Logged |
Jimbo 1 dr3w j00 4 p1ggy!
|
posted 03-21-2001 14:40
As long as it looks like every other competently designed E/N site out there, what's wrong with that?Let's face it, this IS an E/N site and therefore it must have a bunch of fairly brief blurbs arranged in reverse temporal order from top down on a front page, hopefully with archives of older shit that scrolls off the page. It must also have a navigable internal link area - ie, thingies to click and hit the BBS, the message board, and the other non-news sections of the website itself. Optionally, it can have links to other sections of the web. These links can be in a section all their own, or they can be directly linked from the front page, or the best of them can be on the front page and the rest of them on the separate section. Given all these functional constraints, yes, it's probably going to look like every other damn E/N site... which won't matter, because it WON'T be every other damn E/N site, it'll be Penismightier.com, which is the whole fucking reason we ARE here and not at every other damn E/N site any damn way. Right? As far as design elements that ARE unusual even in an E/N site, I very much like the Flash link-of-the-instant and the flash tagline generator. They are muy cool. The vertical... dammit, I already forgot, starts with a K (Katakana?), but at any rate the vertical Japanese text scroller looks very cool to me, but it's not as flavorful as the other two, so I wouldn't hesitate to see it go if it clashed with a new design element. But I don't see why it would, so why fuck with it? I don't really like the Flash expand-o-text link section on the left. The colors are too dark to read on most monitors until they are moused over and begin expanding, and the whole thing strikes me as unnecessarily "gadgety." I would probably replace it with standard HTML stuff, personally - but then, my aesthetic sense when it comes to functional components of a website is pretty Spartan. I would recommend making one easily identifiable section for functional links - preferably on the left side, where the current Flash one is, with all components easily visible whether or not they're selected. If there are many of them, they should probably be organized into demarcated subsections, so that the most "important" are closer to the top and possibly somewhat bolder than the others. And that's all I've got to say about that. [/Forrest] IP: Logged |
eod TREAT MERIGHT!
|
posted 03-21-2001 15:07
I love the top. I wouldn't mind seeing a 2.0 version of it. With the colors updated a bit and some things spruced up, course that means the whole rest of the site needs to change before that does. And I have to second, I love the random link and text script. We will always have that.I've been thinking of having some sort of menu system possibly at the top, maybe under the flash stuff. It really depends on the format that we organize all these links. IP: Logged |
Jimbo 1 dr3w j00 4 p1ggy!
|
posted 03-21-2001 15:18
I lied, there's one other thing to say, which is basically just a suggestion for basic code structure:<table><tr><td>Flash and HTML Header Stuff Goes Here</td></tr></table> <table align="left" width="250"> <tr><td>Internal Links Go Here</td></tr> <tr><td>External Links and/or Miscellaneous Crap Links Go Here</td></tr></table> <!--#include virtual="output of Fen's php news backend goes here"--> This, of course, would produce a basic structure like this:
====================== !.......header.......! ====================== !...! !...! !...! E/N shit !...! !...! !...! ... with the advantage that posts would start displaying immediately, even if the top and sidebar tables hadn't finished rendering yet. Of course, it would be even more l33t if Fen just made a tiny modification to his php backend so it automatically generated the tables in question at the "top" of the page and appended the posts onto it. That way there wouldn't be ANY "active" components on the page to load the server down, it would just be serving plain HTML. IP: Logged |
fenomas argument nazi
|
posted 03-21-2001 19:33
Jimbo- That all sounds like good ideas to me. The only problem is that they are already implemented. The page is currently a frameset, so the top, left, and main frames load simultaneously, not in sequence. And the php script creates a flat html page which is served to the reader. You only view dynamic content when you search for past posts. As for me, of course I'm a big fan of flash, and I think it gives a lot of cool opportunities. If you're worried about too many links on the left side, I've been working lately (for another project) on an expanding/contracting meny system in flash that (and this is the cool part) pulls data out of an xml file, meaning you can change the menu without editing the flash. This is just an example of how I think flash can help- all it requires is to be built into an overall site design. There are a lot of great sites that mix html with flash seamlessly, and wind up with a whole greater than the sum of the parts. fen IP: Logged |
Jimbo 1 dr3w j00 4 p1ggy!
|
posted 03-21-2001 19:42
I just hate frames, fen.  I'm not as rabidly anti-frame as some people, but they do make unexpected things happen with certain browser operations like refreshing. It's really disconcerting when, for example, you hit refresh to see if a thread page updated since you were away and the index page comes back. Me no likey. IP: Logged |
eod TREAT MERIGHT!
|
posted 03-21-2001 20:00
Jimbo: Thats why you right click in the frame you want to refresh. I actually would like to do away with the frames myself. It is something to consider in the redesign.IP: Logged |
zippy Member with a member bigger than the member with a member
|
posted 03-21-2001 20:07
dearest fen:i've noticed that all web-based admin products from ibm use a spiffy java applet/script type menu that can be expanded. is that what you were referring to? IP: Logged |
Jimbo 1 dr3w j00 4 p1ggy!
|
posted 03-21-2001 21:36
eod: I know, but sometimes I forget the right-click thing. (Weis ain't the only one with a pipe, you know. )IP: Logged |
fenomas argument nazi
|
posted 03-21-2001 22:23
zip - In general, yes, but not based on jscript or anything. There are a number of dHTML things that have been put together, but they are often pretty lame, and dHTML has a LOT of limitations that Flash doesn't. The only really limiting thing about a flash menu system is that it is confined to it's object bounding box. If it could expand to layover the page and the contract out of the way, that'd be rad.Jimbo- I didn't realize that table vs. frameset was the point you were making. I'm pretty ambivalent there... I don't think there's any huge reason the page uses frames, except so that the titles don't scroll off the page, and to separate up the content into different files. fen IP: Logged |
FaRaN Member with a member bigger than the member with a member
|
posted 03-22-2001 12:47
no no no, frames are GOOD. It's so c00l and h1p to not like frames these days. Therefore lets do frames. I like 'em, you can do funky things with them. Yes really!
IP: Logged |
hussain S4d4m Hussain, 1st General, IRC & Script Kiddie Division
|
posted 03-22-2001 20:49
urge to slap fen increasing. must wage holy war against frames. repent... convert to ssi. IP: Logged |
psyci Gr4ph1c4l P3nn3r
|
posted 03-22-2001 23:43
yeah, anti-frames is just the way every E/N site is going these days. And sectioned tables with rounded corners. So many rounded corners. God dammit.IP: Logged |
fenomas argument nazi
|
posted 03-23-2001 07:31
hussein-huh? wha? why? if someone goes to the message board and then back to the main page, why make the server piece together header and body files so the flash at the top loads twice? fen IP: Logged |
Jimbo 1 dr3w j00 4 p1ggy!
|
posted 03-23-2001 09:41
... because current browsers' handling of frames is retarded.The behavior of the "Refresh" button is bad enough, and in the case of PenIs, it's really the only problem - but lots of folks just have undying hatred by now for standard framesets due to the long, long history of frames being used for evil purposes. Like the legions of frameset pages that load links in one of their frames rather than in the whole page, and then make it difficult to get the hell out of the frameset without going up to the address bar and manually typing in an URL to replace the whole page. Of course, one should always consider Hanlon's Razor - "never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity" - but whether the results are due to malice or stupidity on the part of the webmasters of those framed pages, the general public reaction to framesets now tends to be "ewwwwww!" - even when the page that reaction is made to isn't, technically speaking, deserving of it at all. IP: Logged |
Demon-of-Elru TFC Bitch
|
posted 03-23-2001 16:19
I like the way the website is right now. It be cool, good flash stuff. But about the 2.0 header thingy, try a green instead of the dark pinkish colour. I'd say make the page look more industrial or whatnot, but that'd cliched n my opinion. Ultimately, the layout will be changed as how you guys see fit. Whatever you guys to do it, I'm sure we will like it. If we don't, we will get used to it.IP: Logged | |