work=affiliates&rating=r">




UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
  PenIs Forum
  General Discussion
  Massive Multiplayer Final Fantasy - Good? Bad? Ugly?

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Massive Multiplayer Final Fantasy - Good? Bad? Ugly?
CapnBiggles
clmesdad. stopplease sirmyass is bleeding
posted 01-06-2002 15:51     Click Here to See the Profile for CapnBiggles     Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Check the beef here.

Comments? Flames? Opinions?

IP: Logged

MightyMon
s0m30n3 s3t up us the m0n
posted 01-06-2002 16:36     Click Here to See the Profile for MightyMon   Click Here to Email MightyMon     Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
My main contention is that FF is an RPG series. There is a story with a definite conclusion. As you said, Biggles, MMORPGS ain't usually like that...they're perpetual. Sure, it might be cool, but the big draw of the FF series are the stories.

But then again...Square's got a good reputation for doing things well, so I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt. I would absolutely love it if it were a true world, where players' actions had consequences, where if goals weren't met, you'd be fucked. I hate the whole deus ex machina aspect of current MMORPGs. The developers set up scenarios, with attainable goals, but if players can't meet those goals in time for the next update, then the developers go ahead and make NPCs do the dirty work. That's not how a FF-based world should operate. How rewarding is it to not achieve the goals yourself? I would surely have hated it in FF7, for example, if some NPC came down and showed me how to beat Emerald Weapon. Or gave me the locations of all the playing cards in FF8. Half the fucking fun is finding out for yourself.

Give me a FF MMORPG (any more acronyms, please?) where, if players fuck up, the world gets destroyed --- and by destroyed I mean the MMORPG starts over, for everyone --- and I might be happy. At least there'd be a risk, a sense of urgency, a need to actually acomplish something.

But shit....I know I'll probably see you on-line for the launch of FFXI, Biggles, no matter what they do to it.

IP: Logged

CapnBiggles
clmesdad. stopplease sirmyass is bleeding
posted 01-06-2002 16:46     Click Here to See the Profile for CapnBiggles     Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by MightyMon:
But shit....I know I'll probably see you on-line for the launch of FFXI, Biggles, no matter what they do to it.

heh, you're right. In the final estimation, it all comes down to the fact that it's Final Fantasy XI, and as such you have to give it an intial chance/nod.

IP: Logged

treyh37
Member with a member
posted 01-06-2002 22:57     Click Here to See the Profile for treyh37     Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
I'm not completely sure about this but I heard one of the main things in FF 11 will be that there are 3 major natures warring against each other. you choose your race and which of those nations you want to be from. At the end of each month which ever nation is ahead in the battle gets some kinda bonus.
I heard it from I believe www.rpgamer.com or www.thegia.com not sure which

still I've played almost every FF there is (haven't played the japanese only ones on the nes) so I'm going to get the game just as soon as I get a ps2 and FF 10 first

later
trey

------------------
all those who side with me when my reign of evil comes get free parking spaces

IP: Logged

InThrees
Member with a member bigger than the member with a member
posted 01-07-2002 14:54     Click Here to See the Profile for InThrees   Click Here to Email InThrees     Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
I don't know guys, I'm pretty turned off by MMORPGs in general, but I can't say this doesn't have potential.

FF has traditionally been an RPG? With a story? So was Ultima, and look at the success of UO. People enjoy playing it, even if they aren't there to kill Mondain, or become an avatar, or rescue Lord British or what have you.

It's an Ultima-themed world that people enjoy. (Until they take up fishing, and start pulling up 30 different force macing weapons a day when all they REALLY want is a %$#!@$ vanq swords weapon, and maybe a painting or two.)

So what are we looking at? An FF-themed 'world' where Joe Blow can learn special moves, hunt in the wasteland, and engage in PvP. Not save the world.

If you like this idea, try it out. If you don't like it, then just stick with the single player RPGs you enjoy.

-3

IP: Logged

Chiastic
Neophyte Pen
posted 01-07-2002 19:22     Click Here to See the Profile for Chiastic   Click Here to Email Chiastic     Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
I dunno.

FF XI will probably wind up being the only FF game ever that I don't buy. I think Biggles said it best. Mmorpgs are surrogate realities, and behave as such too. Players are actually impressed with the high level characters with the fancy "sword that drops once every 10000 kills of mob x that spawns once an hour," despite the fact that all ownership of that particular string of 1's and 0's represents is weeks of bona fide real life WASTED in front a computer monitor.

Sure, you can decrease spawn times, increase drop rates, speed up the treadmill, and toss in interactive storylines, but the essential factor of mmorpgs, the race for uberness, is always gonna be there, and it just doesn't sit well in my mind.

EQ, AC, UO, AO, DAoC, WW2oL, the upcoming Warcraft mmog, SWG, and now Final Fantasy... the bastardization of gaming is nearly complete. I swear that this is one trend that I wish would just die.

Unfortunately, there're more than enough pasty white, attention starved, friendless wastes of flesh with no lives that are perfectly willing to squander their pathetic lives whacking the bar of their skinner boxes trying in vain to achieve some sort of respect from fellow human beings (even if that respect exists only in a world that isn't even real) to keep the mmog industry alive and raking in the cash for years and years to come.

The sad part is that catering to that particular variety of cretin is doomed to be such a cash cow that eventually you'll be hard pressed to find an actual game to play that isn't just a glorified version of whack the mole. Thank god that most console users still haven't plugged the damned things into the internet yet.

Chiastic
"The internet killed computer gaming"

[This message has been edited by Chiastic (edited 01-07-2002).]

[This message has been edited by Chiastic (edited 01-07-2002).]

IP: Logged

treyh37
Member with a member
posted 01-07-2002 21:38     Click Here to See the Profile for treyh37     Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Chiastic:

Chiastic
"The internet killed computer gaming"


I don't think the internet has killed computer gaming just it just hasn't found a good way to make the mmrpg as good as single player rpgs.

also the other genres you can play on the net I believe are very good like FPS and strategy games like starcraft and the upcoming warcraft 3.

that reminds me you can sign up to try and get in the beta in about an hour or so.

later
trey

------------------
all those who side with me when my reign of evil comes get free parking spaces

IP: Logged

All times are PT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Penismightier.com

Look out for the mexican. He knows where you hide your cake.

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.44
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 1999.



work=affiliates&rating=r">